ashley dawn fall 2011/winter 2012

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Project 3

I definitely had a lot of fun with this project. I have been doing a lot of scanning this term with this project, and my book project was also heavily scan based. I feel that scanning is a form of camera-less photography that is so interesting, and it's something that I want to keep exploring. I feel the way that the scanner records data is very interesting and in a way that I haven't seen before, and I can see myself becoming immersed in this "medium", very easily. I spent a long time composing these and just figuring out how the scanner works, but I ended up being very happy with my product and excited to keep scanning in my art.







Leggi tutto >>

Chapters 8-10 Response

In the beginning of chapter 8, Ritchin mentioned that he once helped curate a Magnum show where there were over 400 images being shown that in shutter speed only took all but 4 seconds to create. As photographers, we create an outstanding amount of photographs all the time. Each photoshoot I do, whether is be for fine art, or for more commercial purposes, I almost always top over 400 photographs. To even think about that only equalling out to be a number of seconds in the larger spectrum is just amazing to hear because of all the work you put into them in post production. Also, in these photoshoots, I know for myself at least, I tend to delete a lot of photographs as I go. Ritchin mentioned this briefly and said that photographers see this deletion of photographs are erasing a permanent record, which made me want to stop deleting photographs because I'm not scared of the permanent record, I never had thought about it that way. One more point I found interesting in chapter 8 was the notion of the photograph being voiceless, which I agree with in the context he's talking about. He's saying that often enough photographs become voiceless in the journalistic context because the photographer often doesn't know the person and so that person's true nature doesn't come out, they're just subject to a "judging on a book on it's cover" look instead of making it so that person is depicting in their most true state. I feel that photographers should have some sort of established relationships with their clients in order to give them a voice through the photograph.

Chapter 9 was very helpful for me when I was doing my book project. My book project was based on making photographs into mixed media pieces, and this section of the book helped me see the variety of possibilities that the photograph can be subject to and morphed to create new meaning, but still have that strong moment basis that photography offers. The end of this chapter spoke a lot to me in that he was talking about how the digital environment is this alternate universe that has many tools and that with this synthetic universe, we can use it to our advantage, which is what I was looking to do in the final product of my book. By bringing together all of these different technologies, I feel I was taking a peek into the digital environment and using it as a tool.

In the last chapter, I found that I couldn't relate to it as much, but I appreciated his wrap up on the ideas of being careful with digital photography and the way we enter that world indefinitely. The idea of coexistance between the analog and the digital was also another idea I found compelling.

Overall, I found this book to be helpful in my reading of digital photography. It gave me a lot of things to think about, as well as a better understanding of the digital world of photography and how it's something we need to be careful with in terms of how we use it and absorb it in the larger spectrum of the photographic world. It's something that can be taken advantage of very easily and that with care, we can create something beautiful with it. I definitely think that some chapters were more helpful than others, and that the readings about journalistic photography weren't as helpful for me because I'm more fine art based rather than candid/journalistic base, but it was still an interesting perspective to see nonetheless.
Leggi tutto >>

Chapter 7 Response

A segment that really stuck out to me in this reading was when Ritchin says, "In may in fact be time for professionals to pay more attention to how amateurs envision the world"(130). I feel like this is very important to the social photograph because too often, professional, journalistic photographers are looking through the lens with only one perspective and that is the view that all the other photographers are taking. Whenever I'm at a large event, I always see professional photographers always having the "best view possible", when really, that view isn't very realistic for the viewer of the work in it's final print. People can't always relate to the photographs that journalists take because that wasn't how they might have experienced the event themselves. In sports and political photography, the two most photographed events for photojournalists, that same, close up photograph is being taken, and I agree that it's about time for professionals to start taking more of an amateur view and to start letting go of these stereotypical shots. The photo pass won't buy you the best shot, but more like the one that everyone else wants to take. Perhaps a shot from in the crowd spectating the event from another viewer's point of view would be more interesting than the shots we see all the time.

In the set "Nuclear Nightmares" that Ritchin was highlighting on, a larger sense of pushing the boundary of the stereotypical journalistic photograph began to take a turn and make it so something moving could come from overstepping boundaries. Though this work was controversial, I feel it made a difference in showing people some realities they may not have known about. That series also made me think about how the integration of text is so incredibly important to think about in photography, and that it can completely change the viewer's reading of the work. If it weren't for the text in that series, the viewer could be left very confused and perhaps scared, but the text is more eye opening for the viewer in the way that it's used and made it so it couldn't be denied.

I also found the idea of digital photography as needing authenticity to be very interesting too. Because digital photography can be manipulated so easily, the worth and authenticity of is questioned so much more, but with project like "Nuclear Nightmares" or "Purple Hearts", the authenticity is hard to deny. People wouldn't photoshop moments like that, it's not questioned really. But if it were photoshopped, how would people judge that authenticity level? The digital moment in conjunction with authenticity is something that really captured me in this reading. The social photograph demands authenticity that's harder to deliver in this digital age.
Leggi tutto >>

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Scanning

Leggi tutto >>

Ice #7 Part 1

400%



110% 6 times
Leggi tutto >>

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Reading Response #5: (Ritchin Ch.6)

I found this reading to be eye opening in the sense that I hadn't realized how imperative it is to pay attention to how we are using sound and text in our photographs. This reading really made it obvious to me how the meaning of the photograph changes so drastically with how it's presented in terms of form, sound, and text. By putting text on a photograph, in accordance to Ritchin, you are telling the author what to think or what to feel. By adding sound, you are creating a soundscape to a visual representation of the real. By displaying your photographs in a certain form, you are shifting the way the viewer reads them, and are creating a narrative. The order in which you display photographs is incredibly important in context to having your viewer understand what's going on, to understand your narrative.

I also found the idea of the smart photograph towards the end of the reading to be interesting, and how microsoft is making this to make it so photographs have a DNA to them. I find it to be making photographs one step closer to being that depiction of the real, which I find very compelling. In photography, at its core, the point is to be depicting what you are seeing in its rawest, most real, sense. In attaching this DNA type profile to the work, we would be getting closer to making photographs be absolutely real, and I find that absolutely amazing. The photographs would then share something super authentic with the viewer, and that would be DNA, it would make the connection between the viewer and the work to be more personal, they would both have an identity, per say.
Leggi tutto >>

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

ICE #6

DRY MOUNT:



WET MOUNT:
Leggi tutto >>